Author: Ignatius Amadeus
The views of the Authors are not necessarily the views of Enigmose
No, you’re not crazy. They just want you to feel that way.
There is a special flavor of cognitive dissonance experienced by those confronted with the dawning of a collectivist utopia. It’s found in the twilight between luminescent NuThink, and the benighted remainders of objective reality to which we plebs still cling so bitterly.
Allow me to illustrate.
Recently, as I perused the social media headlines about the present plague year, I came across a news item whose image featured the governor of Pennsylvania and his secretary of health, Dr. Rachel Levine, who is in fact, a man. It struck me because the news was not about Dr. Levine’s chimeric redefinition, but it was a serious news piece about a serious issue, and the doctor was peripheral to the point of it. The presentation of such an incongruity—an appointed official whose gender LARP is only slightly more convincing than that of Corporal Maxwell Klinger—without the slightest batting of an eyelash, is the whole game in a nutshell.
You see friend, it requires no acknowledgment since there is nothing of note here. Only the grotesquely gauche would stumble. We have serious business to do. Please focus.
The deadpan delivery leaves you feeling gaslit by the reality being proffered. The implicit assertion is not truth, but the situation itself is reality—formed by consensus, and presented without comment.
But, at least it’s democratic gaslighting…
This collective lack of acknowledgement, cemented by the integration with serious business being done, makes anyone who is tripped up by the disjoint feel that he is on the outside. Anyone hampered by a pedestrian tethering to pre-postmodernism is made to feel the keen edge of their status as the other.
It’s akin to having walked into a business meeting, and finding one of the participants is wearing a bear suit. “What’s with the bear suit?” you ask. The reply is cold stares.Read More
Leftist Brain Washing Techniques
Psychological Tactics of The Liberal Left
The tactics employed by current day Leftists were developed in the 30s and 40s by the Nazis and Stalinist Russia ,perfected by the totalitarian dictators of Communist China in the 50s and 60s, and utilized extensively by American Liberals since at least the early 70s.
Exposed in a fictional format by George Orwell's science fiction novel entitled '1984', it was scientifically first exposed by Robert Jay Lifton in Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'Brainwashing' in China iThought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China - Paperback 1961 in the 60s. Read More
Words Liberals Have Redefined
'Newspeak' Enforcing Conformity through Language
George Orwell said, 'Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.'
'How strangely will the tools of a tyrant pervert the plain meaning of words.' Sam Adams Read More
False Narratives of the Liberal Left
Why tell the Truth when a Lie will Do ?
False narratives are spun by the liberal progressive machine with the intent of molding public perceptions to the desired level of sublime ignorance. Sublime being a relative term that is defined as "very beautiful or good, causing strong feelings of admiration or wonder" so although it is 'sublime' to the yarn spinner, in reality it is simply ignorance - 'sublime' Ignorance.
Liberal Progressive ideology, is a religion built on a foundation of false narratives. In some cases the narratives are actually based on shreds and fiber of reality, but such is the nature of this insidious monstrosity of a political ideology that honesty, even small threads of truth easily cause runs and tears in the narrative. Read More
