By Rick Gordon - Enigmose Political
The tactics employed by current day Leftists were developed in the 30s and 40s by the Nazis and Stalinist Russia ,perfected by the totalitarian dictators of Communist China in the 50s and 60s, and utilized extensively by American Liberals since at least the early 70s.
Exposed in a fictional format by George Orwell's science fiction novel entitled '1984', it was scientifically first exposed by Robert Jay Lifton in Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of 'Brainwashing' in China i
in the 60s .
Feminists, Gays, Liberal 'Progressives' and other degenerate groups have adopted much of the strategy into their Arsenals.
The Gay movements use of brainwashing and behavioral modification techniques were outlined in 'After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays
' by Marshall Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry and his sidekick Hunter Madsen. A powerfully persuasive, perverse and popular book within the gay community it presents an impassioned plea, and a brilliant strategy for homosexual activists to implement an aggressive, concerted and organized campaign to mold public perceptions, and brainwash the young.
Brainwashing, behavioral modification, thought control, or thought reform doesn't require advanced gadgetry, it doesn't necessarily need to employ incarceration and persistently drilling foreign concepts into your mind.
Civilized human beings are already confined and chained to the flock. The only thing brain washers need to succeed is to be able to bypass the rational thinking part of your brain and implant the suggestions and commands to Obey and comply.
The behavioral modification - brainwashing and propaganda campaign, modeled to a large extent on the tactics pioneered by the Nazis and Communist Chinese employs 3 primary methods ... Desensitization, Jamming, Associative Conditioning, Direct Emotional Modeling and Framing.
Desensitization
Desensitization is particularly useful in relation to the Gay agenda. Through a consistent barrage and exposure to homosexuals in the media, primarily the fantasy world of Television and the Movies, but also on radio, and in the print media , the public would become acquainted and accustomed to gays as a normal part of society and life. Numerous novels, plays, movies, and television shows have tediously worn down and desensitized society from its former disgust with the homosexual.
As per the strategy the image conveyed would be of gays as productive healthy members of society. While in reality, although there are many productive and otherwise admirable gays, the majority are psychologically maladjusted, and an extremely large percentage are infested with a myriad of both organic and mental maladies arising in part from their perverted lifestyles.
Going far beyond HIV/AIDs. This dark side of the Gay Lifestyle was/is taboo - the public must not be made aware of, or exposed to it. Out of sight out of mind.
That fact that the public was/is not permitted to be educated on or even be made aware of the darker side of homosexuality , especially in the early days of the movement can be demonstrated with a 1974 episode of Marcus Welby MD.
The episode tells the story of a teen boy who is sexually molested by his gay science teacher. The episode, --The Outrage-- aired October 8, 1974. Gays exploded immediately - a campaign against the network ensued, gays bombarded over 200 organizations with hate mail and lobbied vigorously. Many major sponsors pulled out ,17 affiliates dropped the program. Some of the affiliates dropping the program were coerced by threats of reprisal if they failed to pull it from their stations . "...Like other media activists Loretta Lotman already had established ties with the management of ... local ABC Affiliate, she warned that if something were not done about the program they would be hit with protests the likes of which had never seen before.." Target: Prime Time: Advocacy Groups and the Struggle Over Entertainment Television
. There are dozens of similar stories , where otherwise uncooperative members of the media were beaten into submission by liberal social terrorists.
Jamming
Jamming is basically psychological terrorism intended to silence expression of or support for any dissenting opinion.
The objective of jamming is to force opponents into silence by accusations of Racism, Islamophobia, homophobia, latent homosexual tendencies, misogyny and so forth. The purpose being to create a social stigmatization of anyone whom opposes the Agenda - whatever aspect of Liberal pomposity is being being promoted at a given time. The command being to CONFORM to the will of Big Brother. Jamming is to ridicule the opponent in the eyes of the world and to evoke a 'pack mentality'.
Psychologically healthy human beings will naturally feel a sense of shame and exclusion when they perceive that they are not part of the the pack, both in their thoughts and actions. The Jamming tactic is to evoke a sense of shame in the opponent when his opposition to 'the movement' surfaces - such as an aversion against homosexuality, pedophilia and sexual perversion or opposition to an influx of illegal immigrants here to displace American Workers.
Any sign of opposition to the invading hoards of cheap labor, gang bangers and drug traffickers flowing across the Southern border, You're a Racist ! Any opposition to an influx of Moslem so-called 'refugees' many of whom are here to participate in Jihad many others who are here to take advantage of the opportunities made available to non-Americans at the expense of Americans and you are an Islamophobic Racist ! Gay propaganda will depict opponents as homophobic and queer hating redneck bigots, as crude obnoxious loudmouths.
Jamming will depict opponents as being isolated from the pack, shunned criticized, and despised. Most importantly however, it must depict the actual offender - be it gays, illegals, Jihadis as experiencing horrific persecution and suffering as a result of the "homophobic - queer hating red necks" . The opponent must be made the villain, both in the eyes of the uninvolved, and when possible in their own eyes also.
Jamming employs the science of Direct Emotional Modeling and Associative Conditioning.
From After The Ball pg. 152-53 'the bigot ..made to believe ... that others will now despise him .[the]effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof .whether he is conscious of the attack or not....the more he [the bigot] is distracted ... the less conscious he will be of the true nature of the process' .
Associative Conditioning and Direct Emotional Modeling
Associative Conditioning sometimes referred to as Neuro Associative Conditioning - involves a psychological process whereby, when two issues are repeatedly juxtaposed, one's feelings about one thing are transferred to the other. Juxtaposition is placing unrelated or different issues in relation to one another. It will have the tendency to draw attention to the attributes of each. When properly executed it will enhance the undesirable attributes of one by drawing upon the qualities of the other.
The most classic example of this Association is Pavlovian conditioning.
Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov, Whenever he gave food to his dogs rang a bell as a neutral stimulus. After several repeats of this procedure, he rang the bell without feeding the animals which still caused an increase in K9 salivation. Basically the dogs had been trained to associate the bell with food and had been trained into a new behavior pattern. Because this response was learned (or conditioned), it is called a conditioned response. The neutral stimulus has become a conditioned stimulus.
Even though Human beings are frequently compared to dogs, especially by rabid feminists, our thinking is a little more complex, a slightly more complex stimuli must be used OR the rational thinking part of your brain MUST BE BYPASSED - which is fairly evident of Liberals in general.
A tactic utilized to support Gay Marriage was to make a comparison of Gay Marriage to Inter Racial Marriage as demonstrated by the internet memes below.
The strategy of course was/is that opposing Gay Marriage is the equivalent to Bigotry
Another good example of Associative Condition employed by Media manipulators was from the Movie X-men.
X-men utilized metaphors traditionally assigned to the gay community in presenting their 'mutant' super heroes and strove to form a mental correlation between their fictional superheroes and real life homosexuals.
X-Men mutants struggle with societies reluctance to accept their mutations, coming out, a term associated with gays coming out of the closet is supplanted with X-Men superheroes "coming out" with their mutations/super powers. The screen writers openly admit that they employed the tactics described here, and in fact boast of their attempts at tampering with the minds of societies youngest members. [See Gay Subtext]. Subliminally, at least, it strives to implant a somewhat hypnotic suggestion in the minds of the impressionable youngsters viewing it that Gays were super-heroes by associating the two.
Other semi-subliminal intrusions are also inserted into the film. Captain America, a symbol of American Patriotism, is depicted as out of touch , somewhat goofy and lacking in substance, he's for all intensive purposes, an idiot. Which is in stark contrast to his character in other films. In one scene , one of the X-men says of Captain America "I can't believe my father idolized that guy !" which was a brazen and somewhat unnoticed attempt to quell any patriotic sense developing in the minds of the youthful viewers.
Direct Emotional Modeling
Direct Emotional Modeling goes back to the pack mentality, it is the natural tendency of human beings to feel what they perceive others to be feeling.
Human beings naturally seek approval and liking from the pack, their crowd. When they witness or perceive someone similar to themselves being disapproved ,disliked and shunned by the pack due to a particular pattern of behavior or spoken thoughts, their social survival... blending in with the pack, dictates that they modify their behavior and rethink their opinions in order to fit in.
Direct Emotional Modeling ensures a symbiotic reaction in the target, it ensures that the target person/people will feel exactly what the other pack member feels and subconsciously transfer it to themselves. It's basically a ripple effect that elicits shame and doubt in the target person, thereby jamming any satisfaction that they would experience under natural conditions. It's a highly effective method of behavioral modification on a societal scale.
The targeted people do not actually need to be made to believe that they are a bad people, and others will now shun and despise him. Such a task attempted directly outside of the subconscious level would be next to impossible. It is possible only through continuous and repetitious conditioning . The more the target is distracted the less conscious he'll be of the true nature of the mental conditioning process which works to the advantage of the puppet masters.
Examples of Direct Emotional Modeling are many, the media is rife with them. Manipulation of language, distortion of facts to suit agendas are business as usual in the Modern Liberal media.
Framing
Framing is a psychological theory which suggests that people will have a different reaction to an idea when it is given a positive spin than they would if it was given a negative spin. Advertising professionals, public relations people and propagandists must possess a clear and concise knowledge and understanding of this concept to successfully spin their spiel. The implications of framing is that our decisions and opinions are based more on our predetermined attitudes rather than factual evidence. In communication, and advertising and propaganda campaigns framing defines how the media will shape mass opinion.
Framing, when properly executed in social discourse short-circuits counter arguments. No one can speak up against an effective frame and say, Why, yes, I do think women should be raped and I do think women should be sex objects. when discussing the Feminist "rape culture" frame . And no one can speak out against the Gay intrusion into public schools under the guise of tolerance and diversity and state I do think students should kill themselves, or I do think gay kids should be beat up.
Again in the degenerate aspect of the Culture Wars - Gay 'rights', a scheme of gay infiltration into the classroom using 'tolerance and anti-bullying' programs as a perfect path to classroom indoctrination was introduced. Kevin Jennings, a Gay Teacher and former Obama safe school czar said the following ... 'If the radical right can succeed in portraying us as preying on children, we will lose. Their language .... is laced with subtle and not-so-subtle innuendo that we are after their kids' He then went on to propose a strategy of how they could get at our kids which included a campaign of framing the debate using tolerance and anti-bullying as a tool to get their foot in the door.
The strategy involves linking the Gay Agenda to universal values that all members of society share. Basically to latch onto tolerance, diversity, safety, and peaceful coexistence amongst children of many variations - which is a good thing. It's a tactic referred to as Framing. From this simple dirt path, they seek to build a super-highway into the minds of our youth. Anybody who objected to the Gay Agendas planned indoctrination would be heretofore be labeled a heartless bully, a homophobic demon with a complete disregard for children and students.
'This framing short-circuited their arguments [heterosexuals] and left them back-pedaling from day one, .... No one could speak up against our frame and say, Why, yes, I do think students should kill themselves , This allowed us to set the terms for debate.' - Kevin Jennings
The New Mind Control. “Subliminal Stimulation”, Controlling People without Their Knowledge
The internet has spawned subtle forms of influence that can flip elections and manipulate everything we say, think and do
Most of us have heard of subliminal stimulation, the presentation of short messages that tell us what to do but that are flashed so briefly we aren’t aware we have seen them. In 1974, the Federal Communications Commission opined that the use of such messages was ‘contrary to the public interest’. Legislation to prohibit subliminal messaging was also introduced in the US Congress but never enacted. Both the UK and Australia have strict laws prohibiting it.
...Packard had uncovered a much bigger problem, however – namely that powerful corporations were constantly looking for, and in many cases already applying, a wide variety of techniques for controlling people without their knowledge. Read More
Calling someone an ‘illegal alien’ in New York City could lead to $250,000 fine - NEW YORK — New York City has banned the term “illegal alien” when used “with intent to demean, humiliate or harass a person,” the city said. The city’s new guidelines, announced last week, also ban discrimination against someone based on their English proficiency and threats to call immigration authorities on someone “based on a discriminatory motive.”
These violations can result in fines up to $250,000.
‘Sexist’ Ad Banned for Having the Word ‘Girl’ in It - A freelancers website was forced to apologise and retrained its advertising staff on using sensitive language after publishing an advertisement with the word “girl” in it.
Britain’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) came down on PeoplePerHour, a website that connects freelance workers with businesses, for a London underground ad last year that featured a woman with the phrase: “You do the girl boss thing, we’ll do the SEO thing.”
‘Hate Crime’ Is Only a Step Away From Thought crime
Does it make sense that a person can burn an American flag with impunity but not a gay-pride flag? Earlier this month, a judge in Story County, Iowa, sentenced Adolfo Martinez to a preposterous 16 years in prison for swiping the rainbow flag from a nearby church and burning it in front of a strip club.
Cambridge Researchers Launch ‘Hate O’Meter’ Software to Treat ‘Hate Speech’ as ‘Malware’ - Researchers at the UK’s University of Cambridge have created a new software technology that treats online “hate speech” as a computer “virus” or “malware.” The “Hate O’Meter” warns users they are about to view “hate speech” and gives them the option of viewing the content in advance.
The authors note their research on the “Hate Speech detection” paper is “funded by the Humanities and Social Change International Foundation.” [Founded By A German Socialist Erck Rickmers.]
