Katya Sedgwick
@ American MindIf it came to anyone’s surprise that San Francisco has been running an open bar for the homeless, it’s only because this very San Francisco program somehow went under the radar. The NGO outfit was recently discovered by a local entrepreneur and chair of the Salvation Army Advisory San Francisco Metro Board, Adam Nathan.
Nathan posted his observations on what he discovered hidden away at Hotel 587, in an old SOMA hotel:
It’s set up so people in the program just walk in and grab a beer, and then another one. All day.… Inside the lobby, they had kegs set up to taps where they were basically giving out free beer to the homeless who’ve been identified with [Alcohol Use Disorder].
Nathan reported that the program costs $2 million a year. He voiced his concerns about its efficacy as well as the fact that it’s not known to the public—it’s unclear who runs it and who approved it.
Turns out, the project is worse than initially reported. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, it currently serves 20 individuals at the cost of $5 million a year:
Program officials said that nurses assess patients and typically dispense the equivalent of one to two drinks three to four times per day—doling out either 1.7 ounces of vodka or liquor, 5 ounces of wine, or 12 ounces of beer.
In other words, enough to keep everyone enrolled happily inebriated. The New York Post reported that over its four years of existence, it has served a total of 65 clients. It’s not clear what happened to the 45 addicts who transitioned out of it.
San Francisco writer Erica Sandberg pointed out that the city did something similar during COVID closures, when it provided secluded rooms for the homeless in chic hotels. The Department of Public Health partially funded the deliveries of alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco, all administered by staffers. Deadly fentanyl poisonings skyrocketed during this period, likely because sequestered addicts had little to do aside from partying solo.
The Managed Alcohol Program (MAP) that Nathan spotted in the hotel was also born at the onset of the shelter in place, when a San Francisco sobering center decided to put its frequent flyers into a facility where they could be confined to a single building. It was one of the temporary government programs that became permanent once the emergency measures expired. In this case, a sobering center switched sides in the topsy-turvy world of health emergency.
In a promotional video posted by UCSF School of Medicine, Program Director Alice Moughamian admitted that MAP’s goal is not to decrease the volume of alcohol consumed, but to mediate the social, health, and legal fallout, like the use of acute care units and interactions with the police. Each alcohol dose “is personalized [to the participant’s] own need and his own desire,” Moughamian explained. In other words, the cops don’t interact with the drunks to bring them to a sobering center; they are already at a sobering center, and they get all they wish on the taxpayer’s dime.
From what Moughamian says, it doesn’t sound like any doctors are involved in prescribing the alcohol or drugs that are administered. Instead, they ask the alcoholics how much they drink and, with their input, figure out what the dosage should be.
As Moughamian openly admits, the officials running MAP take the hard harm reduction approach favored by San Francisco’s Department of Public Health. The department once plastered ads across the city showing happy partiers, urging addicts to do drugs with their friends because, in their opinion, it’s safer that way. The only abstinence-based rehab program in San Francisco is the Salvation Army.
Bryce Bridge, another MAP employee, revealed that cannabis consumption at the hotel is rampant and that despite running a closed campus, they catch enrollees with outside alcohol about once a week. And there’s no telling if other substances are being consumed there. He also hinted that there are incidents of violence, and it doesn’t sound like the police are called to deal with them.
The ethicist Tanya Majumder described how MAP conducted a death panel for Mr. G, a 38-year-old patient with severe AUD, psychotic disorder, and a host of physical ailments, including pancreatitis. It sounded like his physician told him he needed to quit. But MAP decided to take another approach. Although drug maintenance remains highly controversial, Majumder nevertheless reasoned, “Autonomy is prioritized in the U.S. and the Global North.” Since they are dealing with limited resources, MAP asked Mr. G to choose between a longer life without alcohol and a shorter life with alcohol. To no one’s surprise, he chose the latter. After getting that answer out of a vulnerable man, they went on with enabling his addiction.
This is not to suggest that MAP has not had financial success. Bryce Bridge showcased two enrollees who were able to drastically reduce their use of emergency services in the six months following completion of the program. The center figured that the former sobering center saved the city $1.7 million by reducing hospital visits. It’s worth noting that San Francisco drug poisoning deaths fell slightly over the period following the COVID closures—that covers most of the time when Hotel 587 was operating. So the drop doesn’t appear to be inconsistent with the city’s overall trajectory.
Most of San Francisco’s homeless do not appear to be using alcohol only. Currently, synthetic opiates like fentanyl dominate the scene. There are no known attempts to successfully manage opiate addiction via harm reduction. Full Article @ American Mind
San Fransisco Homeless Crisis Plight of the People under Socialism
Tents, Homelessness, and Misery: 9 Things I Saw in San Francisco- After years of reading about the alleged horrors of San Francisco, I decided I wanted to see for myself if the City by the Bay was really in such dire conditions.
I’d grown up 30 miles south of San Francisco, occasionally popping in for field trips or shopping or sightseeing. Sure, the city had always had homeless people, but the conditions I read about—needles everywhere, “poop maps” documenting the location of human feces—seemed absurd.
How bad could it actually be in one of America’s most famous cities? Read More
Project on Poverty and Inequality in California
...California Socialism: Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer Read More
Battle for California Is the Battle for America
The Golden State’s progressive feudalists have one fatal weakness: They are wrong. The fundamental premises they use to justify their actions are flawed. Read More
