Comparing the Credibility of Blasey Ford and Reade

If the self-professed women’s advocates were less hypocritical, they would give the same treatment to Creepy Joe Biden that they gleefully inflicted on Brett Kavanaugh.

Raegotte Report






Author: GEORGE S. BARDMESSER

The views of the Author are not necessarily the views of Enigmose

That crackling sound Joe Biden is hearing is not the Rice Crispies in his cereal bowl. It is the sound of ice slowly starting to give beneath his feet.



Two recent articles prompted this piece—one by Cathy Young and the other by Monica Hesse. Unsurprisingly, both Young and Hesse conclude that Christine Blasey Ford is more credible than Tara Reade. Unsurprisingly, I disagree.

It’s not complicated. By every imaginable measure, by any conceivable standard, Tara Reade’s allegation that Joe Biden sexually assaulted her is far more credible than Ford’s.

Passage of Time

Given the passage of time, there is no possibility for a solid factual determination of what happened in either case. In Ford’s case, the event occurred (if it occurred at all) when both she and Brett Kavanaugh were teenagers, 36 years earlier.

Biden’s alleged assault on Reade occurred 27 years ago. Events that might have occurred 27 years ago between adults in a work setting, however, are easier to establish and remember than events that might have occurred 36 years ago between teenagers at a summer weekend party involving alcohol.

Thus, here Reade is a few points ahead of Ford in terms of credibility.

Knowing the Alleged Perpetrator Many on the Left gloss over the fact that to this day no one has established that Kavanaugh and Ford actually knew each other or even met. In nearly 20 months, not a single journalist has produced one shred of evidence that Kavanaugh and Ford were ever even within one mile of each other. This should be an insurmountable stumbling block—but nothing will stop the partisans.

Young dismisses this difficulty with a breezy “it’s a fact that they traveled in the same social circles.” This sleight of hand raises its own questions. Is it a “fact,” and what, exactly, were their social circles?

Ford went to Holton-Arms School, which was not a Catholic prep school. Ford was also two years younger than Kavanaugh. A two-year age difference is nothing for adults—but it can mean a great deal to 17- and 15-year-olds. Kavanaugh was a rising senior in the summer of 1982—it is easier to see him socializing with rising seniors from nearby Catholic girls’ schools than with a 15-year-old rising sophomore from a relatively distant non-Catholic one.

Nor is it apparent that their social circles, however defined, were the same, or even that they overlapped much. Is it possible that they met somehow somewhere at some social function? It is not impossible—but Ford’s supporters bear the burden of proof on this. One must assume they have searched under every rock and tree, and came up dry.

Tara Reade, on the other hand, worked for Biden. It is clear, then, that they met, and met multiple times.

This factor is overwhelmingly in Reade’s favor.

Motivation Blasey Ford’s motivation to lie was always clear—she is a committed Democratic partisan. There was good reason why she erased her entire social media trail before “coming forward.” There was good reason why she hired the particular set of lawyers who represented her. There was good reason why she contacted her congressional representative and then Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and not someone else. Blasey Ford surely understood the explosiveness of her allegations and their potential impact on the Kavanaugh confirmation. All her protestations to the contrary were bunk, and only highlight her dishonesty.

Deborah Katz, Ford’s lawyer, said last year:

[Kavanaugh] will always have an asterisk next to his name. When he takes a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character, and we know what motivates him. And that is important; it is important that we know, and that is part of what motivated Christine. Young (and others) explain this inconvenient admission by arguing the audio quality is poor, and what Katz actually said was “That is part of what motivated Christine in discharging her civic duty.” (Italics added by Young.) But even if, arguendo, Katz said this, it changes nothing in our understanding of Ford’s motivation to lie—a partisan hit job on a conservative Supreme Court nominee, dressed up as a “civic duty,” is still a partisan hit job.

Witnesses ... Documentary Evidence ... Credibility and Reputation of Accuser ... It is beyond doubt that Christine Blasey Ford lied about many things.

At a minimum, she lied about her “fear of flying” preventing her from coming to Washington to testify (despite regularly flying cross country, to Hawaii, and other international hotspots). Blasey Ford (and her lawyers) were playing games, using her supposed “fear of flying” as an excuse to delay and drag out the process.

Blasey Ford also lied about adding a door to her house because of the psychological “trauma” she suffered in 1982—the real reason (it came out weeks later) was that she was converting part of the house into a sublet apartment.

Consistency of the Story Over Time ... Reputation of the Accused Respecting Women .... Reaction of the Accused ... Final Analysis Many Democratic politicians and left-leaning journalists are today twisting themselves into multi-dimensional pretzels, trying to explain why they so uncritically accepted Blasey Ford’s weak, inconsistent, contradictory, and uncorroborated story, but refuse to extend the same courtesy to Reade. One concocted narrative is that Blasey Ford’s allegations are somehow more credible than Reade’s.

They are not. Full Story - American Greatness





Crying Rape in a 'Woke' World

cry rape

Even advocates of rape victims admit that false accusations are common. The disagreement is in the percentages. Some claim that about 2% are false, others state that the rate is around 8%, the pentagon claims 18% and some sources say 41%. How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie Pop - and how many wrongly convicted of rape are never exonerated - the World will never know Read More




Oppression Mentality - Brief History of Victim Complex

Victim mentality or martyr complex in individuals is an acquired personality trait / disorder. On a individual basis the person tends to view themselves as having been victimized through no fault of their own, the tendency is to seek a villain or victimizer to blame for ones problems.

Feminists, Gays, Liberal 'Progressives' and other non mainstream groups have adopted much of this strategy into their Arsenals.

In extreme cases a victim mentality manifests itself as, or progresses into neuroticism and at times mushrooms into hostility, aggression and violence. All human beings are subject to a Victim mentality to one degree or another. The mildest being the tendency to blame someone else for your own shortcomings and the inability to accept responsibility for ones failures.

"The central belief of every moron is that he is the victim of a mysterious conspiracy against his common rights and true deserts. He ascribes all his failure to get on in the world, all of his congenital incapacity and damfoolishness, to the machinations of werewolves assembled in Wall Street, or some other such den of infamy." ..H.L. Mencken

Marxist theory attempted to rally the have nots against the haves aka Class warfare. Overthrowing the haves and creating a Utopian never never land was the ultimate goal. Nazi theory took Marxist theory to a new level and placed all the blame for Germany's misery on Bourgeois capitalism and the 'International Jewish conspiracy'. Modern day Neo-Nazi Marxists seek out Demons in popular Society and try to invent a visualization of white supremacists rallying around Donald Trump hiding beneath your bed. Read More - Enigmose - Rick Gordon