Author: Robert Stacy McCain
The views of the Author are not necessarily the views of Enigmose
Ever since President Trump was elected, conservatives have nervously watched the poll numbers to see whether constant attacks from Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) were damaging the president’s popularity among his core constituency. Of course, Trump has sometimes suffered from self-inflicted damage — at times, he is his own worst enemy — but never in recent history has any president faced such unrelenting opposition from the moment of his election.
Trump’s shocking 2016 upset of Hillary Clinton, which contradicted nearly every expert forecast, triggered a series of events that included the “Russiagate” investigation, the Democrats’ takeover of the House in the 2018 midterm election, and Nancy Pelosi’s impeachment proceeding against the president that culminated in his acquittal in February. As soon as that crisis ended, Trump was immediately plunged into the COVID-19 emergency, in which his leadership was questioned and the strongest suit of his reelection platform, a robust economic performance, melted down in the span of a few days. Throughout his term, the major national news media have worked hand-in-glove with Democrats to treat Trump as an enemy to democracy itself, with journalists enlisted as part of the “resistance” to the president’s alleged authoritarianism.
Trump has his flaws and weaknesses as a candidate, but these are already well-known to the electorate, whereas Biden’s flaws and weaknesses have not yet been targeted in a sustained campaign.
Because all of this is so unprecedented, no one had any idea what the ultimate result might be, and many pundits who succumbed to poll-gazing obsession were inclined to believe two things: First, that Trump, who fell short of a popular-vote majority in 2016, faced an uphill challenge to win reelection in 2020; and second, that Joe Biden was the Democrat best qualified to beat Trump. Both these beliefs might yet prove true, but there is evidence that the poll-gazing pundits are as wrong now as they were four years ago. In fact, Trump’s reelection could already be a near certainty, and the establishment Democrats who lined up behind Biden’s candidacy may be leading their party to a landslide defeat in November.
Take a look, for example, at the RealClearPolitics average of the Trump–Biden matchup. The first thing to notice is that Biden has always led that matchup, at times by double-digit margins. But those are national polls, and, as frustrated Democrats have been complaining for the past three and a half years, our presidential elections are not a nationwide referendum. Instead, the Electoral College decides the outcome, which is why Trump became president despite losing the national popular vote by nearly three million votes. Clinton amassed her popular-vote majority in a handful of solidly “blue” states — winning California with a 4.3-million vote margin, New York by 1.7 million, Illinois by 940,000, and Massachusetts by 900,000. A handful of lopsided wins, in states that the Trump campaign never contested, thus entirely explains this phenomenon. Because any nationwide poll will reflect this same influence of lopsided Democrat margins in a few large “blue” states, Biden’s persistent lead in such polls must be discounted in terms of their power to predict the outcome in November.
Taking a closer look at that head-to-head national matchup, however, gives us more reason to doubt that Biden’s “electability” is as decisive a factor as Democratic kingmakers have claimed. Biden’s greatest lead in the RCP poll average — a margin of nearly 12 points last September — has shrunk steadily, and not because Trump has become more popular. Instead, while Trump’s poll average has hovered in a range between 41 percent and 45.6 percent, Biden’s average has declined from a high of nearly 53 percent last September down to 47.6 percent as of Wednesday. This trend is remarkable when you consider everything that has happened in recent months, as Trump went from the impeachment ordeal in February to the COVID-19 crisis. Democrats and their media allies have savagely criticized Trump’s leadership in the pandemic (“The ‘Orange Man Bad’ Disease,” March 30), but polls indicate this has done little damage to the president among his core supporters. Instead, it is Biden who has suffered declining support during this crisis, losing 3.6 points in his RCP average since March 21.
Do these numbers really mean anything? Polls are not predictions, as any pollster will tell you, and we cannot rely on poll numbers to forecast outcomes six months ahead of an election. For example, four years ago, in May 2016, Hillary Clinton enjoyed a six-point lead over Trump in the RCP average, and we know how that story ended. In retrospect, we can see that Clinton suffered from being perceived as the “establishment” choice, representing a status quo that Trump successfully challenged. In the aftermath of the 2016 election, pundits mining the exit-poll data have located other factors — Clinton generated less enthusiasm among black voters than had Obama, for example, although this was not really surprising — yet nothing really mattered more than Trump’s bold challenge to the policy status quo. Departing from the standard-issue Republican formula, Trump rejected the “globalist” agenda of free trade and unlimited immigration, advocating a new nationalism expressed by his campaign slogan “Make America Great Again.”.
How has that played out? Well, the COVID-19 pandemic has certainly done nothing to increase American confidence in the benefits of globalism (see Richard Shinder’s recent American Spectator article). China’s communist regime has played the villain and, in the process, has exposed the danger inherent in a policy of outsourcing manufacturing overseas. Full Article - American Spectator
The Spectator is a weekly delight for anyone who loves good writing, contentious opinion and hard-hitting comment.
The Kindle Edition of The Spectator contains most articles found in the print edition, but will not include images or cartoons.
Democrats Planning to Replace Joe Biden
Never was former Vice President Joe Biden the 2020 dream Is there a path to nominating someone else?
Never was Joe Biden the 2020 dream. He promised electability and familiarity, which turned out to be good enough for a plurality of Democratic voters in the early primaries. But now that every other Democratic contender has dropped out and dutifully lined up behind the presumptive nominee, that choice might be sitting less comfortably. Biden occasionally moves past gaffes into total incoherence, raising questions about his mental fitness. Worst of all, evidence for a sexual assault allegation against him begins to mount.
Sources suggested this was being considered less than two weeks ago with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo as their new preferred choice.
Hillary as per Fox News Anna Paulina is ‘like herpes’ because she ‘won’t go away’. She has endorse Joe Biden for the presidency. With Biden out, the Democratic National Committee, a group of around 350 which is "composed of the chairs and vice-chairs of each state Democratic Party Committee and over 200 members elected by Democrats in all 57 states and the territories," would vote to select a new nominee .... Hillary ? Read More
Stealing the Election in Plain Sight
If you were still harboring naïve notions of free and fair elections when Democrats are involved perhaps this will help disabuse you of those fantasies.
A prominent Democratic lawyer who represented Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign [Marc Elias] is threatening to sue the state of Nevada unless it immediately suspends prosecutions for ballot harvesting before the June 9 primary, among a slew of other demands, according to a letter obtained by Fox News on Tuesday.
Ballot harvesting, or the practice of allowing political operatives and others to collect voters' ballots and turn them in en masse to polling stations, has drawn bipartisan concerns of fraud from election watchers.
At the same time, Elias called for Nevada to stop throwing out ballots when signatures on voters' ballots appear different from those on voters' registrations Read More
>Bin Laden plotted killing Obama so the 'totally unprepared' Biden would succeed him
What does it say about Joe Biden's leadership that Osama bin Laden thought it would be best to have him at the helm of the U.S.
Joe Biden has always billed his decades-long stretch in the swamp as "experience." His presidential election team has put him out as the steady hand, the familiar reassuring standard-bearer of business as usual, the competent guy who can handle a crisis.
So what does it say about Joe Biden's vaunted leadership in a crisis that a creature as vile as Osama bin Laden thought it would serve his interests best to have him at the helm of the U.S. as a sure way of creating chaos instead of Barack Obama? Read More
