Author: RAHEEM KASSAM AND NICK REGAN Via the National Pulse
The Views of the Author are not necessarily the Views of Enigmose
THE FAMILY WHO OWNS THE NEW YORK TIMES WERE PRO-CONFEDERACY SLAVE OWNERS, AND THE NATIONAL PULSE CAN TODAY REVEAL THE TIMES‘ FAWNING COVERAGE OF AN ANTI-BLACK VOTE CONFERENCE WITH PRO-LYNCHING ADVOCATES IN ATTENDANCE. THE PAPER’S HEADLINES FROM THE TIME DECLARED: “NEGRO SUFFRAGE A FAILURE.”
Writing in the New York Post this weekend, columnist Michael Goodwin explained The New York Times, under the leadership of Arthur Ochs, published an editorial in 1900 saying the Democratic Party “may justly insist that the evils of negro suffrage were wantonly inflicted on them.”
The Ochs-Sulzberger family still owns the paper, with Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr serving as its Chairman, and his son, A.G. Sulzberger serving as Publisher.
Further investigation by The National Pulse reveals a far more horrific history of anti-black sentiment from the pages of the New York Times – the rag which maintains the original Ochs’s established strap line: “All the News That’s Fit to Print.”
That same line appeared above an editorial from Thursday, May 10th 1900.
“The Political Future of the South,” lamented the “negro vote,” referring to the “horrors of negro rule,” and blasted Republicans for promoting and passing legislation that went onto become the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which states that “race, color, or previous condition of servitude” cannot be used to stop someone voting.
“The Republican Party committed a great public crime when it gave the right of suffrage to the blacks,” the Times roared on page six, calling “barriers against negro suffrage” a consequence of “wiser counsel.”
One day prior, on May 9th 1900, the paper gave fawning coverage to the former Secretary of the Navy Hillary A. Herbert, who had convened a conference titled “The Race Problem.”
Herbert, a Democrat who served under President Grover Cleveland, said at the time that the black vote had “brought weakness instead of strength,” and the New York Times cribbed his speech for the headline which blasted: “NEGRO SUFFRAGE A FAILURE.” Full Article @ The National Pulse
Family That Owns The New York Times Reportedly Had Slaves, Supported The Confederacy
Members of the Ochs-Sulzberger family — which owns The New York Times Company — were slaveowners and held sympathetic views towards the Confederacy in the 19th century, an opinion column in the New York Post concluded. Read More
Dehumanization of Blacks
If you take left-wing rhetoric seriously, blacks are not human beings like members of other races.
If you take black and white left-wing rhetoric seriously, blacks are not human beings like members of other races. They are first and foremost black; they are human beings defined before anything else by their color—not their humanity, their personality, their character, their mind or their heart. So much so that, according to white and black leftists, if you dissent from this racist view, you are now labelled racist. Read More
Gore Family Racist Legacy
Historical Revisionists have depicted Republicans as racists and angry old white men, when in fact the polar opposite is true.
Case in Point, Al Gore Jr., former Vice President and current 'Climate Change' Warrior made a speech while he was still VP claiming that his father Al Gore Sr. lost his Senate seat due to his support of civil rights legislation. That's quite a bizarre statement giving his fathers legacy as a KKK supporter and one who voted against most Civil Rights legislation Read More
Black Privilege
Racism gallops across the American landscape hourly, daily, weekly, monthly and throughout the year. Everyone assumes that whites cause racism, and blacks suffer victimhood from this phenomenon. But if you travel to Africa, blacks dislike whites and even kill them. In South Africa, the current black government leaders call for ridding that country of all four million whites.
Everybody acknowledges the existence of socioeconomic privilege in which wealthy people have more opportunities than poor ones, but white privilege makes the racist assumption that skin color is a principal factor. As defined in Wikipedia (and there are numerous references on the page), white privilege is "a term for societal privileges that benefit white people in western countries beyond what is commonly experienced by non-white people under the same social, political, or economic circumstances." It is past time to confront the politically correct Left with the issue of Black privilege, as shown by the following public figures
1. Let's Talk about Black Privilege
2. Florida professor cites 'black privilege' amid
George Floyd protests, prompting calls for his firing3. White Privilege Versus Black Privilege In America
4. It's Past Time to Acknowledge Black Privilege
5. 'White Privilege' Is Not What Is Holding Blacks Back Today
Collection Of Commentary ; Black Privilege