These two wonderful doctors have taken a heroic risk being publicly honest about what they have been seeing, experiencing and asking themselves why we are isolating healthy people and imposing "risks from social isolation that are too high."
Two California emergency room doctors may have started a revolution against the Wuhan flu extreme mitigation policies with their calm, very sincere, caring, scientific-based and statistics-emphasizing presentation in a press conference two days ago. Dr. Artin Masihi Dr. dan Erikson are with Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield California.
The comments from viewers at the bottom of this article give you an idea about what they revealed – for the good of the nation and their many patients – and how credible and worth listening to these two men seem to be.
I have constantly felt, from the beginning of this pandemic, that there are many things that do not add up about the extreme, unprecedented and devastating measures that have been put in place to try to stop this novel flu from causing the high numbers of model-estimated deaths that have clearly all proven to be dramatically wrong.
The doctors note that the scientific and statistical evidence does not at all justify the public becoming as terrified of this virus as they are and as the media continues to make them feel every day.
These two men, who have been on the front lines for very long hours every day treating Wuhan flu patients, note, from the evidence they present, that the chance of dying from this virus is actually very low and that it is in fact not much worse than the seasonal flu. They respectfully raise many questions that any good doctors should also naturally be raising.
One of the crucial things they highlight is that we normally do not isolate healthy people during a disease outbreak. During this pandemic, both the sick and the healthy are being forced to endure substantial isolation that results in many negative and even life-threatening outcomes, such as increased suicides and dangerous addictions.
They also warn this extended indoors isolation out of the sun and fresh air will weaken the immune systems of healthy people to the point that they will be more susceptible to the Wuhan virus and other communicable diseases after the isolation is ended. This could cause an unexpected flood of otherwise avoidable, seriously ill patients into hospitals when the isolation period is ended. Full Story - Steve Jalsevac - LifeSite News
Modeling COVID-19 and the Lies of Multiculturalism
See what multiculturalism and inane computer models have wrought
Perhaps the best thing that could come out of this entire debacle and turning America into a police state — where people are arrested for going somewhere in their cars and never leaving their cars — should be a total disdain for and disbelief in computer models.
Computer modeling can be incredibly useful, particularly when you’re modeling physics: ... the accuracy of the model depends on how much you put into it and how much of the real factors on that day, in that place, you can put in. [We have] blinded ourselves to one of the most important factors when modeling disease in human populations: culture. Read More
The Pretense of Knowledge' has Cost America Dearly
Lockdown, as opposed to the more moderate mitigation efforts is a colossal public policy calamity
Recently, Brit Hume, the sober and understated Fox News commentator, voiced the thoughts of millions when he said, “I think its time to consider the possibility… that this lockdown, as opposed to the more moderate mitigation efforts… is a colossal public policy calamity.”
The financial extent of the calamity was quantified by economist Scott Grannis when he observed that “almost overnight, we have wiped out all the net job gains of the past 14 years.” He made that comment on April 12 and the losses aren’t over yet. Grannis bluntly concluded that, “The shutdown of the U.S. economy will prove to be the most expensive self-inflicted injury in the history of mankind.” Read More
The 1619 Project is an ongoing abomination focused on rewriting the history of Slavery in America, it was the brainchild of leftist New York Times journalist, Nikole Hannah-Jones and developed by The NY Times Magazine in 2019 with the stated overt goal of 're-examining the legacy of slavery in the United States'. It was timed for the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first Africans in Virginia. While its overt goal seems commendable, its covert goal is evident and reprehensible.
