ACLU’s Absurd Title IX Lawsuit

The ACLU is suing the federal government
in the hope of weakening its due-process standards

Raegotte Report





Author: National Review Editors

The views of the Authors are not necessarily the views of Enigmose

That the ACLU is suing the federal government in the hope of altering its due-process standards is not headline news. That the ACLU is suing the federal government in the hope of weakening its due-process standards is headline news for the ages. Once more, the line between parody and reality has been blurred.



The targets of the ACLU’s suit are the Department of Education; its secretary, Betsy DeVos; and its assistant secretary for civil rights, Kenneth Marcus. Their offense? To have made it easier for the accused to defend themselves. As NBC News explains, the changes that Secretary DeVos has spearheaded “effectively bolster the rights of due process for those accused of sexual assault and harassment, allowing for live hearings and cross-examinations” — two elementary provisions that, as NBC notes, were “lacking during the Obama administration to protect all students under Title IX.”

Which, per the ACLU, is a problem. DeVos’s changes, the group claims, will make “it more difficult for victims of sexual harassment or sexual assault to continue their educations and needlessly comes amid a global pandemic.”

Remind us again what the C and the L stand for?

Taken as a whole, the ACLU’s lawsuit provides a veritable master class in precisely the sort of non sequitur–laced thinking that the organization once existed to oppose. It conflates “accuser” with “victim” and thereby assumes guilt as the default position. It presents an emotionally charged list of the negative effects that crime has upon the victimized (“depression, anxiety, and suicidality”), as if this has any bearing on the question of guilt, and as if such consequences do not also attach to the falsely accused. It proposes that the mere existence of rigorous due-process standards represents a boon to criminals and a “gutting” of the attempt to fight depravity. It casts statements in favor of due process as intrinsically callous or as suspiciously pro-wrongdoing. And, inexplicably, it attempts to impress an exogenous and unrelated crisis — the “global pandemic” — into the service of authoritarian thinking. Were the ACLU attempting an impression of a thoughtless law-and-order type, it could not have done a better job. Full Article @ National Review






Betsy DeVos sued over new campus sexual assault rules

DeVos new rules, announced earlier this month, will sharply change how schools are required to respond to sexual misconduct allegations. DeVos' rules describe sexual harassment as "Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the recipient's education program or activity."

The lawsuit said conduct has to meet the three criteria of "severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive" in order for a school to respond, as opposed to a previous definition that included "or" rather than "and" in the list. Read More




ACLU Sues Idaho for Banning Male Athletes From Female Sports

The American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho announced it will sue the state government over the Fairness in Women's Sports Act, a law that made Idaho the first state to ban biologically male students from participating in all-female sports. Read More




Origins of the ACLU - Fascist - Communist Roots of The ACLU

Roger Baldwin Communist Founder ACLU

The term "Civil Liberties", when used in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union is one the greatest ironies , or oxymoron's perpetrated on the American Public.

George Orwell [1984-Animal Farm] described this form of tactical mental deceit as 'doublethink' and 'newspeak' which more recent writers have adapted to doublespeak Read More




Novelty License Plates



Yea, Though I Walk Through The Uncanny Valley

You are being gaslit You are on the business end of a casual conspiracy of complicity.

Crazy Girl Tea Party gaslight in background

No, you’re not crazy. They just want you to feel that way.

There is a special flavor of cognitive dissonance experienced by those confronted with the dawning of a collectivist utopia. It’s found in the twilight between luminescent NuThink, and the benighted remainders of objective reality to which we plebs still cling so bitterly. Read More